Recently, I’ve been involved with a few clients who are themselves adopted or have a family member in their recent past who had been adopted. Thus, I feel compelled to bring a few interesting facts to everyone’s attention.

Once again I’ll be discussing a particular use of the results of DNA testing. The focus, though, is on the subject of adoption. As we all know, there are multiple reasons for children to be adopted and there’s no purpose served in enumerating them here. DNA testing has been and will continue to be a cause for joy and misery depending on the circumstances. Discovering an unknown parent or sibling can be a mixed blessing. If you are aware that you were adopted, the right test can answer questions that may have been lingering for decades. On the other end of the spectrum, discovering that you, a close family member or one of your direct ancestors could be a complete, unsettling surprise.

My intent is to point out a monstrous situation that took place in the early 20^th century which may give some a clue as to the adoption brick wall they might be facing. I present this here to point out how nefarious adoption activities can be, and this example is perhaps the most nefarious of all. The circumstances of what took place and the repercussions ripple through the decades and may very well be impacting someone you know.

In the early 20^th century, a woman named Georgia Tann went to work for the Tennessee Children’s Home Society in Memphis, Tennessee. Miss Tann eventually became the director and had developed an extraordinarily cruel process to obtain babies and young children to sell to parents who were seeking to adopt. In Tennessee at the time, the process to legitimately adopt a baby cost $7.00. But by going all across the country, she could charge $5,000 and up for her special services. Most of Tann’s “customers” were wealthy families including famous Hollywood stars. The most attractive children were offered to Joan Crawford, Dick Powell and his wife June Allyson, Lana Turner and others.

She was able to get away with this activity due to her relationships with powerful people in and around Memphis. Judges, political “bosses,” anyone willing to look the other way…and share in her fees.  She was not beneath paying unscrupulous hospital workers to assist her efforts.  It is estimated that as many as 5,000 children were ripped away from their parents in one way or another. Mother’s were told that their newborns had died; families were accused of being unfit to be parents and thus the children were taken away.

Many of the children were housed at the Home Society’s offices. It is said that as many as 500 may have died there due to neglect, abuse, or lack of medical care between 1924 when she b

egan her “services” and 1950, the year she died.

Georgia Tann of the Tennessee Children’s Home Society

Georgia Tann (left) was also responsible for the first legislation regarding sealing adoption records. The concept spread across the country and today, 32 states still have these laws on the books.

This story is not well known in spite of being well documented. I have read bits of the events here and there but recently picked up “The Baby Thief” by Barbara Bisantz Raymond. It is available at Amazon.com in a variety of formats, eBook, hardcover or paperback.  See the link below. Or you might want to see the movie “Stolen Babies” starring Mary Tyler Moore as Georgia Tann, Lea Thompson, Kathleen Quinlan and many others.

A social worker by the name of Anne Beals was responsible for bringing down Tann’s empire. She noticed that the infant mortality record was astronomically high in Memphis and Shelby County Tennessee. This led to an investigation that didn’t catch up to Tann. She died of cancer before any charges could be brought.

For some, this and other similar schemes would have a significant impact on DNA results. The babies stolen by Georgia Tann where born between 1924 and 1950, not that long ago. These children were not necessarily placed in Tennessee but across the country from New England to Calif

ornia. Knowing that these adoptions really happened could help shed some light on a variety of brick wall issues for family researchers.

Here are a few other links that may be of interest:

YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2qhVQR5u08 (length 8:51)

YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaiRYfhvj0k  (60 Minutes segment length 13:51)

YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=392NTjM8IR0 (1-hour 45 min)

Tennessee Department of Children’s Services: https://www.tn.gov/dcs/program-areas/fca/adoption-records/faq.html

All of this is to bring attention to some of the bizarre circumstances that can impede a legitimat

e search for the truth.

My final thought is that if this woman was able to create such a horrible network of actually stealing babies, then how many other people were able to do the same around the country. And not necessarily large networks but even individual circumstances where an adpotion was merely moving a child from one household to another.

My heart goes out to anyone who is affected by these circumstances.